Search for: "Johnson v. Johnson" Results 181 - 200 of 10,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 1:55 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Newly discovered evidence Nearly 30 years after he was convicted of first-degree murder and handgun offenses, Anthony Johnson, the appellant, filed a petition for writ of actual innocence in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City based on (1) a 1998 letter from a State’s witness recanting his ... [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Law of the case Omar Johnson, appellant, who is presently serving a life sentence for first-degree murder, filed a pro se pleading he captioned “Motion to Am end Under Rule 4-345, Sentencing Revisory Power of the Court” with the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:33 pm by Steve Vladeck
I've already written a pair of posts about the very significant current conflict among the circuits over the retroactive effect of the Supreme Court's June 2015 in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Plaintiffs Johnson & Johnson, Cordis Corp., and Wyeth ("Johnson & Johnson) sold stents protected by U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:57 am
The Oregon Supreme Court opinion in State v Johnson (SC S51313), April 19th, 2007:"This case is before us on automatic and direct review of defendant's judgment of conviction and sentence of death. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:30 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
"   Johnson responds to Jacob Appel's recent argument in the Huffington Post that medical resources should not be devoted to PVS patients. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:31 am by David Markus
Significant swings in mandatory sentence zones — from up to 10 years to 15 years to life — turn on the answer.The court ruled a year ago in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:11 am by scanner1
DANIEL JOHNSON, an individual; D and B AUTO PARTS, a business entity; and LINDA JOHNSON, an individual, Respondents, Counter-Claimants, and Appellants. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Smith cited “the lack of certainty of the pathologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer versus a peritoneal mesothelioma in epidemiologic studies” as making the epidemiology uninterpretable and any conclusions impossible.[14] Against this backdrop of evidence, I took a look at what Johnson & Johnson had to say about the occupational asbestos epidemiology in its briefs, in section “B. [read post]