Search for: "Johnson v. Miller"
Results 81 - 100
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 1:20 pm
Discretion for Judges Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: SF 448, a bill passed by the Iowa Senate, gives judges "wide discretion" in the sentencing of persons under the age of 18, to comply with the US Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
Johnson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 11:40 am
” That statute was enacted in 2014 in response to Miller v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Along with Chisholm v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 8:48 am
Additionally, like the facts of Johnson [United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 2:31 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:28 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Military Law Court-Martialed Officer's Habeas Challenge Transferred to Federal Court in Maryland Miller v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
Don't forget, arguments are streamed live over the internet at the appellate court website (here) if you would like to listen in to any of these arguments.September 9--Monday--a.m.Martin Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:05 am
R., 2008 TCC 486, [2009] 1 C.T.C. 2547, Johnson v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Judge Schroeder invokes the handy Miller v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
" The panelists are Paul Cane of Paul Hastings LLP, Michael Rubin of Altshuler Berzon LLP, and Diane Sidd-Champion of McCarthy, Johnson & Miller Law Corporation. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Third, the district court properly applied the firearms sentencing enhancement because Luster reasonably could have foreseen that Davis and Johnson possessed firearms in furtherance of their large cocaine distribution enterprise.In Miller, Keith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:05 am
Supreme Court definition of the term in Miller v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:01 am
This post was written by Siobhan Hayes, Catherine Johnson and Angela Gregson, with contributions from Marjorie Holmes and Edward Miller In the first case subjecting a permitted user clause in a lease to scrutiny under the Competition Act, a landlord local authority seeking to impose use restrictions on its tenant (to promote mixed use in a parade of shops) lost its case on the grounds that it would breach competition law by doing so and that it had not proven that the requirements… [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:31 pm
GONZALEZ v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Holder, 10-694, and Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:30 pm
" (quoting Miller v. [read post]
