Search for: "Johnson v. People" Results 221 - 240 of 2,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 8:22 am by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Attorneys representing these people should continue to argue that Raybon was wrongly decided. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Bruce Ackerman
With the Civil Rights Act moving forward in the Senate,  the Court refused to undercut the state action doctrine in Bell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm by Michael Grossman
When a manufacturer is accused of the degree of negligence currently associated with Johnson & Johnson about its baby powder and other talcum products, which could affect thousands of people, it’s important to spread awareness of the issue. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:27 am by Kristina Araya
In People v Johnson, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed sentencing guidelines for criminal sexual conduct. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
Regardless of why people are homeless, they are and they exist. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Johnson further stated that the seizure remains lawful only “so long as unrelated inquires do not measurably extend the duration of the stop. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:49 am by Jeffrey Taylor
Therefore, Johnson & Johnson, may be liable for the women's damages. [read post]