Search for: "Johnson v. People"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2007, 5:55 am
People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Johnson's other plans made certain there was no possibility to prepare a counter-offensive, even if the time were available.For example, in agency with other government officials, Johnson populated a witness list of over one-hundred people, knowing fully that many credible witnesses did not exist. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:58 pm
(Johnson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am
Abbey v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:38 am
Pointing to the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Johnson pardoned him “for all offences…committed, arising from participation, direct or implied, in the said Rebellion. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:57 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
City of Boise (9th Cir. 2019) 920 F.3d 584 (“Martin”) and Johnson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:55 pm
Trieu v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:55 pm
Trieu v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am
Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]