Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 201 - 220 of 639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2017, 7:38 am by Kenan Farrell
The case was initially filed in Johnson County Superior Court but has been removed to the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm by Frances Rogers
Superior Court (Johnson) (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696 [California Supreme Court held that even prosecutors must comply with the Pitchess procedures if they seek information from confidential peace officer personnel records]). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
Nelson, of the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, conducted a Science Day, on March 7, 2017.2 Federal Talc MDL 2738 In the federal cases, Johnson & Johnson, one of the defendants, initiated the Science Day, in November 2016, when it asked Judge Wolfson to set aside a day in “which the parties and their experts can outline their positions/arguments regarding the medical and science issues at play. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am by Lisa S. Charbonneau
 And while no court has explicitly held that an irrigation district is a municipal corporation under Labor Code 220(b), in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, January 6, January 13 and January 19 conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, January 6 and January 13 conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:32 am by Burton A. Padove
In a lawsuit filed in Johnson County Superior Court, the plaintiff asserts there is a history of car accidents along that section of roadway that gave the state’s transportation department actual or constructive knowledge that safety improvements were necessary. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, 2016, and January 6, 2017, conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 12:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Johnson & Johnson, 654 F.Supp. 568 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (Advil I); McNeilab, Inc. v. [read post]