Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am by Jim Walker
Carnival (cruise lines have duty to warn of crimes in ports of call), Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Superior Court of Orange County (Mayra Antonia Alvarado et al., Real Parties in Interest) (justice pro tempore to be assigned)(5) S187965 People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
 To make three, you need not one, not two, but three.Read Justice Elia's complete opinion for more detail if you're unsure about the concept.Some of this advanced mathematics is moot at this point, since after the Court of Appeal issued its OSC, the Appellate Division of the Santa Cruz Superior Court got the message and stopped hearing appeals with two (instead of three) judges. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, a federal district court in Illinois denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Henson v Canon Business Solutions, Inc, September 24, 2014, Kendall, V). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann
For more on the history and significance of initiatives, check out the Initiative and Referendum Institute.The significance of the right of initiative and referendum was not lost on the California Supreme Court in the decision of Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court S207173. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth, Inc., ___ N.W.2d ___, 2014 WL 3377071 (Iowa July 11, 2014), but Huck isn’t even the last  case on our scorecard any longer – that honor currently belongs to Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
On November 21, 2011, the Commonwealth filed in the Superior Court a `Motion to Compel the Defendant to Enter His Password into Encryption Software He Placed on Various Digital Media Storage Devices that Are Now in the Custody of the Commonwealth’. . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by Clara Spera
As Tara pointed out yesterday, the Supreme Court delivered a huge victory to privacy groups in its Riley v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting evidence that his office had a history of excluding minorities from the position and that decisionmakers, who claimed to have based the decision on qualifications, performed no interviews and reviewed no personnel records, a First Circuit panel found triable questions on pretext and reversed summary judgment for the government (Ahmed v Johnson, May 21, 2014, Lipez, K). [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]