Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
 To make three, you need not one, not two, but three.Read Justice Elia's complete opinion for more detail if you're unsure about the concept.Some of this advanced mathematics is moot at this point, since after the Court of Appeal issued its OSC, the Appellate Division of the Santa Cruz Superior Court got the message and stopped hearing appeals with two (instead of three) judges. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:54 pm
Superior Court (Johnson), 61 Cal.4th 696 (2015).And here's the opening paragraph from a 4/3 unpub today, from which in the first line, you know how the last line will read... [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
The lack of substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s findings results in the court annulling the disciplinary action Meaney v Village of Johnson City, 2012 NY Slip Op 04265, Appellate Division, Third Department The mayor of the Village of Johnson City demoted a fire captain to firefighter first class after adopting the findings of the disciplinary hearing officer that a fire captain was guilty of multiple counts of misconduct and… [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:48 pm by Edward T. Kang
Last month, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reinstated a case concerning the drug Risperdal, which had initially been dismissed mid-trial in 2016. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:30 am
In an unusual decision released October 5, 2007, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice relied on its parens patriae power to assume jurisdiction over two children who habitually resided with their father in Saudi Arabia at the time of the hearing.In Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The District Court ignored among other things the fact that the Superior Court conducted a face to face colloquy with Mr. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by David Markus
And Shereen Charlick (the acting FPD in San Diego) has been appointed to a San Diego County Superior Court judgeship. 3. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:43 pm
Superior Court (Johnson), 61 Cal. 4th 696 (2015); Aghaian v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:14 am by Kenneth Hall
” Although finding that this standard had been met, Bolanos determined that the putative damages in this matter violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as observed by the US Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Superior Court, 151 Cal.App.3d 491, 198 Cal.Rptr. 829 (1984) and Cedars-Sinai Med. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:14 am by Caroline H. Lopez
Lopez Massachusetts Appeals Court On September 21, 2016, the Massachusetts Appeals Court upheld the grant of summary judgment to Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”), the manufacturer of the Ortho-Evra birth control patch at issue in the case of Niedner v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:58 pm by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Superior Court (review granted Oct. 22, 2008 (Brinker) and Brinkley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:44 am by Alejandro J. Paz
Paz Mineral talc, as a raw material, was determined to be “inherently safe” by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maren Nelson in the days leading up to the first Johnson & Johnson California ovarian cancer trial in the Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Cases, number JCCP4872. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (Los Angeles). [read post]