Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, B292416 (Opinion filed 4/16/19). [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Johnson, decided last year (Aug. 6, 2018) by Judge Christopher E. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even the FTC has accepted that puffery works: C&H Sugar was ordered in 1977 not to call its brand “superior” to or otherwise different from other granulated sugars without substantiation. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
The court ordered that $1,556 of the refund be applied to cure an arrearage in plan payments, $444 be paid to the debtor, and the balance be held by the trustee pending further order of the court. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The company said it would appeal the verdict, which occurred in California Superior Court in Oakland. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold an event entitled Mitigating Security Risks to Emerging 5G Networks featuring a keynote from Commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission Jessica Rosenworcel, and a panel including Travis Russell, Chris Boyer, Ambassador Robert Strayer and moderator Clete Johnson. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
Later, in an interview with Fox News in 2016, he defended his actions as simply performing his “end of the bargain”—relying on his judgment, as well as the responsibility entrusted to him by his superiors, to execute his mission “in good faith” given the rules and the “context” in which he was serving. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]