Search for: "Johnson v. Thompson"
Results 21 - 40
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
However a few hours later, in State of Kansas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Creech, ___ U.S. ___ (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
., Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLP On December 15, 2014, in Heien v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
By: Michael Thompson In Ibanez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
Thompson, 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Johnson & Johnson.).Covell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167 (6th Cir.1995), that competency determinations are mixed questions of law and fact, it concluded that the subsequent United States Supreme Court holding in Thompson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: R v Penguin Books Ltd: When Lady Chatterley’s Lover was Put on Trial (The Collector). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
Thompson gave DHS the green light to move forward. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
Thompson involved post-conviction DNA testing. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Johnson v Goyette, 2018 ABCA 353 AREAS OF LAW: Family law; Unjust enrichment; Joint family venture ~A trial judge’s finding on whether a joint family venture exists is a factual one, reviewable only for palpable and overriding error.~ BACKGROUND The Appellant, Sandra Johnson, and the Respondent, Danielle Goyette, were in a 13-year common-law relationship. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
Johnson, Politics and Parasites: The Contribution of Corruption to Human Misery Controversy: Global GovernanceThomas G. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:02 pm
Conversely, in Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
