Search for: "Johnson v. US Army Corps of Engineers" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Steve Davies
Congress is out to stop EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers from issuing their final guidance on the scope of the agencies’ regulatory authority under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
  They issued just one opinion in an argued case: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
H.R.5865 - To require the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to protect Native American burial sites, village sites, and cultural resources discovered at Corps of Engineers civil works projects in the Sacramento River watershed, and for other purposes. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Christina Reichert
Army Corps of Engineers constructed the Herbert Hoover Dike, a series of levees, culverts, and locks to contain the lake, along with sixty-seven miles of other dikes along the lake’s southern shore. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
Army Corp of Engineers (“USACE”) and a Louisiana landowner over the agency’s Clean Water Act (“CWA”) jurisdiction over the subject property. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
Justice Wainwright wrote for the majority, emphasizing that it was “the United States Army Corps of Engineers, not the State of Texas, [that] exercised its exclusive authority to deny petitioner’s application for a federal mitigation banking permit on the land. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Johnson, 13-10288, have all been redistributed for the March 20 Conference. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
United States Army Corps of Engineers 14-493Issue: (1) Whether a jurisdictional determination, that is conclusive as to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, and binding on all parties, is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the finality requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The issue came back in 1985, he again ruled against the Army Corp of Engineers, and the Second Circuit again affirmed unanimously. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
After being retained by Pierce County, Washington, to develop a waste disposal facility in the early ‘80s, Resource Investments, Inc. acquired a parcel of “uniquely desirable” land – desirable, that is, for locating a trash dump – and went about securing necessary permits, including a Clean Water Act permit, which the Army Corps of Engineers denied. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Show us that we've missed something and we'll add it.Federal Common LawNo way, no how. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Monte Mills
Army Corps of Engineers was still weighing whether to approve a permit for the pipeline to cross the Missouri River, just upstream from the Standing Rock Reservation. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 14-493, becomes the latest rescheduled case to underperform. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The agreement with Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray and OEPA director Chris Korleski, will require A&L Salvage to forfeit more than $4 million in financial-assurance bonds so the money may be used to cap the landfill’s 42-acre disposal area. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]