Search for: "Johnson v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 2,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
    Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 am by Bradley McAllister
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that the court's 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Here's the snippet from Johnson that gets the court past Blakely as announcing a new substantive rule:In Summerlin, the United States Supreme Court described the difference between substantive and procedural rules. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:06 pm by Ben Allen
United States, affirming the district court's denial of a post-Johnson habeas petition, is yet another decision restricting Johnson habeas relief. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am by Jack Goldsmith
  First, an important difference between a traditional armed conflict and the current one is that when the Germans were defeated, the POWs in the United States were thrilled to go home and posed no ongoing danger when released. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1251 Issue: Whether a court may grant a federal habeas petition collaterally challenging a sentence under Johnson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 Paragraph 75 of the amended complaint, for example, alleges thatCongress has provided that it is illegal for undocumented immigrants to be in the United States and has required the executive branch to remove those individuals. [read post]