Search for: "Johnson v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Very quick, unpublished opinion today in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:21 am
Johnson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan Nancy Edmunds has concluded there is... [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:07 am
Johnson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
Two units of Johnson & Johnson must pay $16.6 million to the family of a Chicago-area woman who died after using a Duragesic pain-patch, a state jury found, dealing the company its fourth defeat in as many trials since 2006. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:47 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:13 pm
Gayle, 142 F.Supp 707, a ruling later upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:14 pm
IPNews® - Johnson & Johnson unit Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. won a major patent infringement victory Tuesday when a New Jersey federal judge held that its patent for the popular birth control drug Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo is valid. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:53 pm
United States:... [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that the court's 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:24 am
" The case came after the court's 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Yesterday Americans United announced that it has filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a resident of Johnson County, Tennessee who sought to have the county display two posters on the separation of church and state in the lobby of the county court house. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:13 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Here's the snippet from Johnson that gets the court past Blakely as announcing a new substantive rule:In Summerlin, the United States Supreme Court described the difference between substantive and procedural rules. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:11 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
