Search for: "Johnson v. Waldrop" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
Justice Waldrop dissented because the letter did not have to be interpreted as Simmons's expressing frustration because Johnson was truthfully ratting him out, but a rational jury could certainly read it that way. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]