Search for: "Johnson v. Warner" Results 1 - 20 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 424 F.3d 249, 254 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am by Karen E. Keller
Johnson Matthey Inc. and Johnson Matthey Catalysts, LLC (patent infringement) 10/13: Stiefel Research Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
" A claim of false advertising may be based on at at least one of two theories (Time Warner Cable v DIRECTV (2007)):that the challenged ad is literally falsethat the ad, while not literally false, is nevertheless likely to mislead or confuse consumersThe claimant must demonstrate that the false or misleading representation involved an inherent or material quality of the product and that the injuries to be redressed are the result of "public deception"… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm by Gordon Firemark
Warner Bros case (.pdf) California Appellate Report: Ladd v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
This one too is masterminded by Alan Johnson and Alexandria Palamountain.* Failure! [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Paul Johnson of McCorkle and Johnson in Savannah, Georgia, and by attorney, certified public accountant (and several other initialed credentials), Martin Varon of Alternative Resolution Methods in Smyrna, Georgia. [read post]