Search for: "Johnston v. Johnston"
Results 341 - 360
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 11:04 am
Onge Steward Johnston & Reens, Wesley W. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff was entitled to commence this legal malpractice action even though the underlying personal injury action was still pending, as the legal malpractice action accrued, at the latest, in November 2014 (see Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786, 787 [1993]). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
The 1709 Blog welcomes a new team member in Andy Johnstone, who will be known to many readers of this blog as one of its most frequent comment-posters on copyright-related matters. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Johnston v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The EU Council and the European Parliament are, at least in theory, supportive, according to the media release that Jeremy mentions in this post.* Hyperlinks and the CJEU 'new public' criterion: a Response to RosenAndy Johnstone (who also contributes to the CopyrightAid.co.uk forums) responds to the Katpost "The CJEU 'new public' criterion? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:09 pm
In this week’s case (Sidhu v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
However, in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:23 am
In this week’s case (Musgrove v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Courts and commentators agree that the political-vote privilege was first recognized in the 1795 South Carolina decision Johnston v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Johnston, 291, Ga.Sup. (1982). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 11:40 am
Johnston, 876 F.2d 589, 594 (7th Cir.) [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
Johnston, of course, addressed the bioethical issues for medical practitioners. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:10 pm
It is puzzling that he concludes on March 8, 2006 that Fritz is incapable with a 19/30 MMSE test score and capable with an 18/30 test score on April 28, 2005.[24] The PPA [Patients Property Act] does not require doctors to have any additional qualifications or experience other than being medical practitioners licensed to practice medicine in British Columbia and current members in the British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons (see Johnston v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
The Law Lords grappled with this question in 2007 in the case of Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd ([2007] UKHL 39). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
