Search for: "Johnston v. Johnston" Results 81 - 100 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 12:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Johnston.[2] Según se ha estudiado el tema, se ha encontrado que hay factores, conscientes, subconscientes o inconscientes en los que un padre o madre contribuye a enajenar o alinear al menor en contra del otro. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 10:42 am by Lee E. Berlik
Employers aren’t required to articulate a reason for letting go an employee (see Johnston v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee            In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:10 am
Sandstrom, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, January 3, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“It is well settled that a claim for legal malpractice accrues as of the date of the malpractice complained of or, if the attorney-client relationship has continued, as of the date when that relationship terminates” (Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786 [2d Dept 1993], citing Glamm v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff was entitled to commence this legal malpractice action even though the underlying personal injury action was still pending, as the legal malpractice action accrued, at the latest, in November 2014 (see Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786, 787 [1993]). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
David Johnston QC submits that he has, on a counsel to counsel basis, offered Kenny McBrearty QC a chance to see the Respondents’ Note of Argument. 1554: David Johnston QC submits that there are a wide range of views on the manner in which the country leaves the EU. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to Burmah Oil v LA [1964] UKHL 6 noting there appeared to be no difference between the Scottish and English position on prorogation. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
The first one, authored by Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge), discusses two decisions, one of which is the passing off case Johnston v Archibald Orr Ewing & Co (1882). [read post]