Search for: "Johnston v. Johnston" Results 141 - 160 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2017, 4:46 am by Carl Neff
Plaintiff argued an exception to this rule in the Third Circuit decision of Johnston v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm by Stephanie Gutierrez
Background and decision On May 2, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal released Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
Previously, the state adhered to the Frye standard, which was established by the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:05 am by paola Aurucci
Perez v Fernandez: Australia's First Decision on the Moral Right of Integrity" (2013) 23 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 174UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-32JANI MCCUTCHEON, University of Western Australia - Faculty of LawEmail: jani.mccutcheon@uwa.edu.auThis article examines the recent Federal Magistrates Court decision of Perez v Fernandez, Australia’s first case on the moral right of integrity. [read post]