Search for: "Johnston v. Love"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 9:44 am
While neither the Utah Supreme Court or Court of Appeals has decided the engagement ring question, in the case of Hess v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
Orange is for voluntary dismissal . . .because we say soFederal National Mortgage Association v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:55 am
The recent case of United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
Ward (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Post-Majority Child Support Ruling Reversed in Columbia: Johnston v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm
Bennett Johnston was running for reelection. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:22 pm
Johnston, 127 FRD 145 (N.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
(herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Post-Majority Child Support Ruling Reversed in Columbia: Johnston v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That was also rejected by Proudman J as going against the finding in Johnston [Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690 (our note here)] that a reviewing officer’s failure to serve a “minded to find” notice is not cured by the applicant having had the opportunity to make representations before the decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That was also rejected by Proudman J as going against the finding in Johnston [Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690 (our note here)] that a reviewing officer’s failure to serve a “minded to find” notice is not cured by the applicant having had the opportunity to make representations before the decision. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
* 3D printing and the law: three recent studies and some recommendationsCentre for Intellectual Property Policy and Management (CIPPM) researcher Dinusha Mendis presents three reports on the IP implications of 3D printing that she recently published along with her colleagues Davide Secchi and with Phil Reeves (Stratasys, formerly Econolyst) on a commission of the UK Intellectual Property Office… * 3D printing and the law: three recent studies --… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:49 am
Johnston, [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought… [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
- Stuart JacksonAlice Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Still on the 1709 Blog, Andy Johnstone updates an earlier post with news that big-cat loving Shakira [you have to be really famous not to have a surname, purrs Merpel who is still trying to lose hers] is not after all a plagiarist. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Jani, with an eye to the future, would love to know if any readers of this blog are interested in contributing to his blog in a guest capacity. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
The article concludes that copyright law now requires a radical overhaul if it is to serve any practical purpose in the digital age": Andy Johnstone. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:39 am
These people are vigilantes who love to target RSO's and harass them, call them pedophiles, etc. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
Johnstone, 2011-NMCA-045. [read post]
