Search for: "Joiner v. General Elec. Co." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
What is particular salient about the Joiner decision, and about which you will find no discussion in the law review paper by Ranges and Oakley, is how well the Joiner opinion has held up over quarter of a century that passed. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
  The Supreme Court itself abandoned his distinction a few years later in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Their article noted that judges easily grasped the problem of generalizing from animal evidence to human experience, and thus they simplistically emphasized human (epidemiologic) data. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
The opinion never analyzed why this charge of cherry-picking and manipulation of the dataset did not invalidate the meta-analytic method generally, or Nicholson’s method as applied. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
They addressed specific causation inferences from what is generally known as differential etiology. [read post]