Search for: "Jonathan F. Marshall"
Results 1 - 20
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
By Joseph Scapellato Holocaust survivors and their heirs face substantial challenges in suits to recover Nazi-looted art in U.S. courts. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).May 27, 2020Balkinization Symposium on Timothy William Waters, Boxing Pandora: Rethinking Borders, States, and Secession in a Democratic World (Yale University Press, 2020) and F. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 8:16 am
Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 404 (1821) (Marshall, C. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
” Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
See 26 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
In his opening statement on Thursday, Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell chose to mention only two of these arguments—Nos. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Here is the column: In his book Profiles of Courage, John F. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
Jonathan Wiersema: Agency adjudication has proliferated in the last century. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
Sharp Capital, Inc., 952 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:45 am
Jonathan Spicer, Huseyin Hayatsever, and Tuvan Gumrukcu report for Reuters. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:12 am
Rogers, Gerard F. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
” Race-conscious policies are illegal under Title VI (though not necessarily under the 14th Amendment) Jonathan Mitchell writes for the America First Legal Foundation that the court does not need to consider the 14th Amendment because “[t]he language of Title VI makes no allowance for racial considerations in university admissions. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Marshall, False [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
Justices Brennan, Stevens, and Marshall dissented. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:15 am
” Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
[I]f one adopts the increasingly prevalent view that antitrust must facilitate unfettered access to markets, thus spurring free entry and expansion by incumbent rivals, the Sherman Act goes from being a prophylactic device aimed at protecting consumers against welfare-reducing acts to being a misplaced regulatory tool that potentially sacrifices both consumer welfare and efficiency in a misguided pursuit of more of both. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 10:47 am
Abrams, Professor of Politics and Social Science, Sarah Lawrence College Jonathan H. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:05 am
Thurmon.Rogers, Gerard F. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
