Search for: "Jonathan F. Marshall" Results 1 - 20 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 In his opening statement on Thursday, Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell chose to mention only two of these arguments—Nos. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:45 am by Seán Binder
Jonathan Spicer, Huseyin Hayatsever, and Tuvan Gumrukcu report for Reuters. [read post]
” Race-conscious policies are illegal under Title VI (though not necessarily under the 14th Amendment) Jonathan Mitchell writes for the America First Legal Foundation that the court does not need to consider the 14th Amendment because “[t]he language of Title VI makes no allowance for racial considerations in university admissions. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:15 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
[I]f one adopts the increasingly prevalent view that antitrust must facilitate unfettered access to markets, thus spurring free entry and expansion by incumbent rivals, the Sherman Act goes from being a prophylactic device aimed at protecting consumers against welfare-reducing acts to being a misplaced regulatory tool that potentially sacrifices both consumer welfare and efficiency in a misguided pursuit of more of both. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Will Baude
Abrams, Professor of Politics and Social Science, Sarah Lawrence College Jonathan H. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]