Search for: "Jonathan F. Marshall" Results 221 - 227 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
Sykes, VP Brokerage - Residential Drew Muller Insurance Jonathan Carroll Insurance cecil m simon Appraisal - Residential Julia Mather Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Julie Larson Brokerage - Residential Marc A Hohenstein Brokerage - Residential M Shachar Interior Design A Hazan Development saul piller Property Management saul piller Investor / Owner arthur hung Brokerage - Residential John Gomes Brokerage - Residential Caroline… [read post]
[I]f one adopts the increasingly prevalent view that antitrust must facilitate unfettered access to markets, thus spurring free entry and expansion by incumbent rivals, the Sherman Act goes from being a prophylactic device aimed at protecting consumers against welfare-reducing acts to being a misplaced regulatory tool that potentially sacrifices both consumer welfare and efficiency in a misguided pursuit of more of both. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
As Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor in the Watergate investigation who was fired during the Saturday Night Massacre, predicted, “[i]f the Executive Branch were left to itself, the practice [of executive privilege] would surely grow. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 1899: Félix Faure, French president, died of a stroke while in his office. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
type=live&comm=uscc&filename=uscc012518 (link is external)Thursday, January 25, 2018Location: Dirksen 419Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:45 AM – 9:50 AM:           Opening Remarks: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:50 AM – 11:20 PM:          Panel I: Mercantilism with Chinese Characteristics: Creating Markets… [read post]
” Race-conscious policies are illegal under Title VI (though not necessarily under the 14th Amendment) Jonathan Mitchell writes for the America First Legal Foundation that the court does not need to consider the 14th Amendment because “[t]he language of Title VI makes no allowance for racial considerations in university admissions. [read post]