Search for: "Jonathan M. Barnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm
” Law professor Jonathan M. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
L.J. 79 (2014) Jonathan M. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Jonathan M. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:30 am
Jonathan M. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:30 am
Jonathan M. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 9:18 pm
O'Malley, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Eddie Lazarus, Chief Legal Officer, Sonos; Jonathan M. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:54 am
And, while I’m on the topic of originalism, here is my Georgetown Law colleague Randy Barnett’s response to Jonathan Gienapp’s blog post, Constitutional Originalism and History, and here is an additional observation by another Georgetown Law colleague, Lawrence Solum. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm
., Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, David Bernstein, David Kopel and Randy Barnett are engaging in victory lap devoted to the proposition “We were right and you were wrong, and the fact that you didn’t predict our being right demonstrates that you are particularly close-minded. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) I appreciate Jonathan Adler’s response on the nature of Randy Barnett’s proposed act/omission distinction on the scope of federal power. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:09 am
Jonathan Barnett examines the claim and finds evidence for it scarce, while finding evidence that markets and private actors correct for anti-commons effects is abundant. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
” Will joins a long list of illustrious recipients, which include our own Randy Barnett (1991), Paul Cassell (1998), Jonathan Adler (2004), Orin Kerr (2007), Eugene Kontorovich (2012) and Nita Farahany (2013). [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:10 pm
I just read a provocative paper that, though I doubt it meant to, reinforced my sense that calling copyright “property” is unhelpful: Jonathan M. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
(Randy Barnett) Remember when the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual insurance mandate was dismissed by all serious and knowledgeable constitutional law professors and Nancy Pelosi as “frivolous”? [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:06 am
" In this, it is the successor to the Paul M. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
– Kristina M. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
I’m fairly sure someone said exactly this in the comments to Jonathan’s post, but I didn’t wade through the 400+ (the VC commentariat is back?!) [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
It is the second post we are publishing today; see also this related post from Jonathan M. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
[This post from Jonathan M. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
[The ideas in this post from Truth on the Market regular Jonathan M. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:13 pm
New York between Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar and Georgetown law professor (and VC contributor) Randy Barnett. [read post]
