Search for: "Jonathan Shaub" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 12:19 pm by Jen Patja Howell
To bring us up to speed with where we are, where we are after the big John Bolton bombshell over the weekend, and the coming fight over witnesses, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic, and Jonathan David Shaub. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:58 pm by Jen Patja Howell
Benjamin Wittes gathered in the Jungle Studio with Margaret Taylor, Molly Reynolds, David Priess, and Jonathan Shaub (by phone) to imagine what that trial will look like. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm by Jen Patja Howell
To discuss it all, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Jonathan David Shaub, Lawfare contributor and incoming faculty at the University of Kentucky Law School, and Lawfare senior editors Margaret Taylor and Scott R. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:03 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jonathan Shaub analyzed how the two branches have historically viewed their constitutional authorities, and how that affects questions regarding congressional subpoenas. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Hannah Kris
Jonathan Shaub looked at the law underlying the executive branch’s refusal to comply with the House’s impeachment inquiry. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 10:38 am by Hannah Kris
Jonathan Shaub examined the process to subpoena witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
Jonathan Shaub argued that the constitutional explanations provided by the Trump administration for not complying with Congress's subpoenas are neither novel nor uncharacteristic of the legislative-executive relationship. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:19 am by Lev Sugarman
Jonathan Shaub analyzed the citizenship and expatriation questions central to controversy over two women who are seeking to return home to the U.S. and U.K. after joining the Islamic State. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:33 am by Elliot Setzer
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate should not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:03 am by Hannah Kris
Jen Patja Howell shared a new episode of The Lawfare Podcast, which features David Priess, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes imagining what the Senate impeachment trial will look like. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:53 pm by Irina Manta
Jonathan Shaub adds his own analysis, including a discussion of the differences between the U.S. and the U.K. approaches--and how Muthana's case might be different from that of British citizen and alleged ISIS member Shamima Begum--here. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:19 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jonathan Shaub noted that the ongoing litigation over Don McGahn’s testimony revolves around a little-noticed question: whether the president has the authority to direct a private individual not to comply with the committee’s subpoena. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:43 am by Gordon Ahl
Jonathan Shaub proposed a less expansive understanding of executive privilege that aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Lev Sugarman
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub unpacked the meaning of President Trump’s “protective” assertion of executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:03 am by Elliot Setzer
Jen Patja Howell shared the most recent episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic and Jonathan David Shaub provide an update on the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Committee Chairperson Jason Chaffetz called Shaub’s comments “highly unethical” and summoned him to a closed-door meeting. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Arizona: “‘Dark Money’ in the States: Arizona GOP Blocks Cities from Implementing Transparent Elections” by Josh Keefe for Newsweek New York: “Appeal to End ‘LLC Loophole’ Is Rejected” by Chris Bragg for Albany Times Union Ethics National: “Rushed EPA Ethics Ruling on Pruitt Condo Deal ‘Problematic,’ Experts Say” by Stephanie Ebbs, Matthew Mosk, and John Santucci for ABC News National: “Top Government… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
., for October Term 2012 at the Supreme Court), with law schools and prior clerkships noted parenthetically: Brinton Lucas (UVA / Wilkinson) Daniel Taylor (Georgetown / Thapar / Sutton) Julia Malkina (Yale / Kavanaugh) Jonathan Shaub (Northwestern / Niemeyer) Not surprisingly, all four fellows graduated from top law schools and clerked for prominent feeder judges. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
.; whether the State Department should designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; and recent appellate court rulings regarding the Fifth Amendment and national security issues: Jonathan Shaub also analyzed the Muthana case, along with the case of Shamima Begum, a young woman who left the U.K. to join the Islamic State, and the citizenship issues at stake. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]