Search for: "Jonathan Shaub" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2019, 6:03 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jonathan Shaub analyzed how the two branches have historically viewed their constitutional authorities, and how that affects questions regarding congressional subpoenas. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
Jonathan Shaub argued that the constitutional explanations provided by the Trump administration for not complying with Congress's subpoenas are neither novel nor uncharacteristic of the legislative-executive relationship. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:19 am by Lev Sugarman
Jonathan Shaub analyzed the citizenship and expatriation questions central to controversy over two women who are seeking to return home to the U.S. and U.K. after joining the Islamic State. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:53 pm by Irina Manta
Jonathan Shaub adds his own analysis, including a discussion of the differences between the U.S. and the U.K. approaches--and how Muthana's case might be different from that of British citizen and alleged ISIS member Shamima Begum--here. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Lev Sugarman
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub unpacked the meaning of President Trump’s “protective” assertion of executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:19 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jonathan Shaub noted that the ongoing litigation over Don McGahn’s testimony revolves around a little-noticed question: whether the president has the authority to direct a private individual not to comply with the committee’s subpoena. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Committee Chairperson Jason Chaffetz called Shaub’s comments “highly unethical” and summoned him to a closed-door meeting. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Arizona: “‘Dark Money’ in the States: Arizona GOP Blocks Cities from Implementing Transparent Elections” by Josh Keefe for Newsweek New York: “Appeal to End ‘LLC Loophole’ Is Rejected” by Chris Bragg for Albany Times Union Ethics National: “Rushed EPA Ethics Ruling on Pruitt Condo Deal ‘Problematic,’ Experts Say” by Stephanie Ebbs, Matthew Mosk, and John Santucci for ABC News National: “Top Government… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
., for October Term 2012 at the Supreme Court), with law schools and prior clerkships noted parenthetically: Brinton Lucas (UVA / Wilkinson) Daniel Taylor (Georgetown / Thapar / Sutton) Julia Malkina (Yale / Kavanaugh) Jonathan Shaub (Northwestern / Niemeyer) Not surprisingly, all four fellows graduated from top law schools and clerked for prominent feeder judges. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
.; whether the State Department should designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; and recent appellate court rulings regarding the Fifth Amendment and national security issues: Jonathan Shaub also analyzed the Muthana case, along with the case of Shamima Begum, a young woman who left the U.K. to join the Islamic State, and the citizenship issues at stake. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm by Margaret Taylor
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by John E. Bies
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.   PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a… [read post]