Search for: "Jonathan Shaub" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am by Elliot Setzer
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am by Hannah Kris
Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am by Gordon Ahl
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am by Anna Salvatore
  Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm by Margaret Taylor
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by John E. Bies
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.   PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a… [read post]