Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 9:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared a new episode of The Lawfare Podcast, which features David Priess, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes imagining what the Senate impeachment trial will look like. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm
Jonathan Shaub argued that the constitutional explanations provided by the Trump administration for not complying with Congress's subpoenas are neither novel nor uncharacteristic of the legislative-executive relationship. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared the most recent episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic and Jonathan David Shaub provide an update on the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:19 am
Jonathan Shaub noted that the ongoing litigation over Don McGahn’s testimony revolves around a little-noticed question: whether the president has the authority to direct a private individual not to comply with the committee’s subpoena. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed a less expansive understanding of executive privilege that aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub unpacked the meaning of President Trump’s “protective” assertion of executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:37 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Quinta Jurecic sat down with Jonathan David Shaub and Mike Stern to discuss the Jan. 6 contempt of Congress cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:53 pm
Jonathan Shaub adds his own analysis, including a discussion of the differences between the U.S. and the U.K. approaches--and how Muthana's case might be different from that of British citizen and alleged ISIS member Shamima Begum--here. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 12:32 pm
” Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes explored the complexities of the contempt case against Steve Bannon. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
Committee Chairperson Jason Chaffetz called Shaub’s comments “highly unethical” and summoned him to a closed-door meeting. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:44 pm
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of of the Lawfare Podcast in which Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with Orpett, Jonathan David Shaub, and Anna Bower to discuss Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling to appoint a special master to review privilege claims over documents seized at Mar-a-Lago: Hyemin Han shared U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 9:22 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Jonathan David Shaub and Mike Stern to discuss the Jan. 6 contempt of Congress cases: Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which McBrien sat down with Daniel Bessner to discuss the debate between the restrainers and the liberal internationalists over the future of U.S. foreign policy: David Priess shared an episode of Chatter in which he sat down with Sarah Churchwell to discuss Gone… [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Campaign Finance Arizona: “‘Dark Money’ in the States: Arizona GOP Blocks Cities from Implementing Transparent Elections” by Josh Keefe for Newsweek New York: “Appeal to End ‘LLC Loophole’ Is Rejected” by Chris Bragg for Albany Times Union Ethics National: “Rushed EPA Ethics Ruling on Pruitt Condo Deal ‘Problematic,’ Experts Say” by Stephanie Ebbs, Matthew Mosk, and John Santucci for ABC News National: “Top Government… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:09 pm
Tiller, Empirical methods in legal communication studies, Hedging language in court decisions, Hedging language in judicial decisions, Ideology in judicial communication, Ideology in judicial decision making, Ideology in judicial legal communication, Jonathan David Shaub, Journal of Legal Analysis, Judges' legal communication, Judicial communication, Judicial decisions, Legal communication, Legal text analysis, Positive Political Theory in legal communication studies, Rachael… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:16 am
., for October Term 2012 at the Supreme Court), with law schools and prior clerkships noted parenthetically: Brinton Lucas (UVA / Wilkinson) Daniel Taylor (Georgetown / Thapar / Sutton) Julia Malkina (Yale / Kavanaugh) Jonathan Shaub (Northwestern / Niemeyer) Not surprisingly, all four fellows graduated from top law schools and clerked for prominent feeder judges. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jonathan David Shaub sits down with Benjamin Wittes to talk about Steve Bannon, executive privilege and misinformation. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Deane School of Law joined Lawfare Editor-In-Chief Benjamin Wittes to discuss Meng Wanzhou’s recent deal with the Department of Justice: powered by Crowdcast A new episode of Lawfare No Bull featured testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee from top Pentagon officials about the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Ronan Bergman joined Benjamin Wittes to discuss the assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub discussed the challenges of prosecuting Steve Bannon and how the committee could eliminate any potential claim of executive privilege to facilitate their investigation. [read post]
