Search for: "Jonathan Shaub" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am by Emily Dai
Anderson, Quinta Jurecic, Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes provided a summary of the Thompson hearing on whether former President Trump can block the release of documents related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am by Katherine Pompilio
Anderson and Professor Jonathan Shaub of the University of Kentucky College of Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am by Gordon Ahl
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Emily Dai
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am by Anna Salvatore
  Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm by Matt Gluck
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:40 am by Katherine Pompilio
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon: Pompilio posted a complaint filed by a group of Wisconsin voters against twelve individuals who allegedly conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm by Margaret Taylor
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by John E. Bies
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.   PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a… [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Trump may have been unusually hostile in his attitude toward congressional oversight, but as Jonathan Shaub has written, the executive’s expansive view of testimonial immunity has developed over the past several administrations, both Republican and Democratic. [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am by Matt Gluck
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]