Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Jonathan Shaub explained the upcoming political battle over the amount of information the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack will be able to access. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:20 pm
Jonathan Shaub provided an update on his earlier article, which explored ways to facilitate Bannon’s prosecution, in light of recent updates.= Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring: Dmitri Alperovitch discussing the ransomware summit; a proposal for regulating Silicon Valley and LinkedIn’s China operations; Tatyana Bolton laying out regulations of algorithms and WhatsApp’s adoption of encrypted backups; Nate Jones on the artificial… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Anderson and Professor Jonathan Shaub of the University of Kentucky College of Law. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub discussed the challenges of prosecuting Steve Bannon and how the committee could eliminate any potential claim of executive privilege to facilitate their investigation. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent filing from the Justice Department which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent Justice Department filing about testimonial immunity of presidential advisers, which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with Natalie Orpett, Jonathan Shaub, and Anna Bower to discuss Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling to appoint a special master to review privilege claims over documents seized at Mar-a-Lago. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon: Pompilio posted a complaint filed by a group of Wisconsin voters against twelve individuals who allegedly conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
