Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am
Anderson, Quinta Jurecic, Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes provided a summary of the Thompson hearing on whether former President Trump can block the release of documents related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Anderson and Professor Jonathan Shaub of the University of Kentucky College of Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon: Pompilio posted a complaint filed by a group of Wisconsin voters against twelve individuals who allegedly conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
Dachs and Jonathan A. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.
PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a… [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
Trump may have been unusually hostile in his attitude toward congressional oversight, but as Jonathan Shaub has written, the executive’s expansive view of testimonial immunity has developed over the past several administrations, both Republican and Democratic. [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]
