Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
.; whether the State Department should designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; and recent appellate court rulings regarding the Fifth Amendment and national security issues: Jonathan Shaub also analyzed the Muthana case, along with the case of Shamima Begum, a young woman who left the U.K. to join the Islamic State, and the citizenship issues at stake. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Anderson and Professor Jonathan Shaub of the University of Kentucky College of Law. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with Natalie Orpett, Jonathan Shaub, and Anna Bower to discuss Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling to appoint a special master to review privilege claims over documents seized at Mar-a-Lago. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Jonathan Shaub explained the upcoming political battle over the amount of information the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack will be able to access. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent filing from the Justice Department which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent Justice Department filing about testimonial immunity of presidential advisers, which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am
Anderson, Quinta Jurecic, Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes provided a summary of the Thompson hearing on whether former President Trump can block the release of documents related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm
Jonathan Shaub analyzed how the Jan. 6 committee should go about prosecuting Mark Meadows. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
Howell also shared an episode of Rational Security, in which the hosts are joined by Jonathan Shaub to discuss the recent one-on-one meeting between Biden and Putin, Jan. 6 subpoenas and Apple’s lawsuit against NSO Group. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:20 pm
Jonathan Shaub provided an update on his earlier article, which explored ways to facilitate Bannon’s prosecution, in light of recent updates.= Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring: Dmitri Alperovitch discussing the ransomware summit; a proposal for regulating Silicon Valley and LinkedIn’s China operations; Tatyana Bolton laying out regulations of algorithms and WhatsApp’s adoption of encrypted backups; Nate Jones on the artificial… [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
Jonathan Shaub examined whether a former president can invoke executive privilege in an impeachment trial. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Howell also shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon: Pompilio posted a complaint filed by a group of Wisconsin voters against twelve individuals who allegedly conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Hosted by Benjamin Wittes, the panel included Anna Bower, Jonathan Shaub, and Natalie Orpett. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck sat down to discuss ongoing Mar-a-Lago document litigation, the House select committee’s subpoena of former President Donald Trump, the Biden Administration’s executive order on handling EU citizen data in the context of American intelligence gathering, and more: Jurecic sat down with Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, and Wittes to discuss historical precedents for current and former presidents testifying before Congress and debated… [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
