Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Jonathan Shaub explained the upcoming political battle over the amount of information the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack will be able to access. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
Jonathan Shaub examined whether a former president can invoke executive privilege in an impeachment trial. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
Howell also shared an episode of Rational Security, in which the hosts are joined by Jonathan Shaub to discuss the recent one-on-one meeting between Biden and Putin, Jan. 6 subpoenas and Apple’s lawsuit against NSO Group. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
.; whether the State Department should designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; and recent appellate court rulings regarding the Fifth Amendment and national security issues: Jonathan Shaub also analyzed the Muthana case, along with the case of Shamima Begum, a young woman who left the U.K. to join the Islamic State, and the citizenship issues at stake. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Deane School of Law joined Lawfare Editor-In-Chief Benjamin Wittes to discuss Meng Wanzhou’s recent deal with the Department of Justice: powered by Crowdcast A new episode of Lawfare No Bull featured testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee from top Pentagon officials about the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Ronan Bergman joined Benjamin Wittes to discuss the assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and… [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm
Jonathan Shaub analyzed how the Jan. 6 committee should go about prosecuting Mark Meadows. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub discussed the challenges of prosecuting Steve Bannon and how the committee could eliminate any potential claim of executive privilege to facilitate their investigation. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am
Anderson, Quinta Jurecic, Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes provided a summary of the Thompson hearing on whether former President Trump can block the release of documents related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent filing from the Justice Department which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Hosted by Benjamin Wittes, the panel included Anna Bower, Jonathan Shaub, and Natalie Orpett. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck sat down to discuss ongoing Mar-a-Lago document litigation, the House select committee’s subpoena of former President Donald Trump, the Biden Administration’s executive order on handling EU citizen data in the context of American intelligence gathering, and more: Jurecic sat down with Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, and Wittes to discuss historical precedents for current and former presidents testifying before Congress and debated… [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
