Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2021, 6:41 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:58 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement over the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a significant loss for Congress and an affirmation of a strikingly broad view of executive privilege. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
Trump may have been unusually hostile in his attitude toward congressional oversight, but as Jonathan Shaub has written, the executive’s expansive view of testimonial immunity has developed over the past several administrations, both Republican and Democratic. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Walter Shaub, the former director of the Office of Government Ethics, compared the Ricchetti brothers’ situation to an instance from former President Trump’s tenure. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
Jonathan Shaub examined whether a former president can invoke executive privilege in an impeachment trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 2:01 am
To talk through it, Benjamin Wittes got together with Lawfare senior editor Scott Anderson who clerked on the DC Circuit, and Jonathan David Shaub, a Lawfare contributing editor and professor at the University of Kentucky J. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
A few weeks ago, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
To discuss it all, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Jonathan David Shaub, Lawfare contributor and incoming faculty at the University of Kentucky Law School, and Lawfare senior editors Margaret Taylor and Scott R. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared the most recent episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic and Jonathan David Shaub provide an update on the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 12:19 pm
To bring us up to speed with where we are, where we are after the big John Bolton bombshell over the weekend, and the coming fight over witnesses, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic, and Jonathan David Shaub. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate should not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 10:38 am
Jonathan Shaub examined the process to subpoena witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared a new episode of The Lawfare Podcast, which features David Priess, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes imagining what the Senate impeachment trial will look like. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:58 pm
Benjamin Wittes gathered in the Jungle Studio with Margaret Taylor, Molly Reynolds, David Priess, and Jonathan Shaub (by phone) to imagine what that trial will look like. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
” Jonathan Shaub looked at the law underlying the executive branch’s refusal to comply with the House’s impeachment inquiry. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
