Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Hosted by Benjamin Wittes, the panel included Anna Bower, Jonathan Shaub, and Natalie Orpett. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Jonathan Shaub discusses how previously disclosed Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memoranda cover the scope and nature of executive privilege as well as the question of how constitutional disagreement between Congress and the executive branch about privilege can and should be resolved. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck sat down to discuss ongoing Mar-a-Lago document litigation, the House select committee’s subpoena of former President Donald Trump, the Biden Administration’s executive order on handling EU citizen data in the context of American intelligence gathering, and more: Jurecic sat down with Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, and Wittes to discuss historical precedents for current and former presidents testifying before Congress and debated… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
Lawfare contributor Jonathan Shaub has written extensively, here, here and here, on how prior administrations have framed and applied the theory of testimonial immunity. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm
The last few days have seen a whiplash-worthy series of actions between Congress and the executive branch, with battles over subpoenas, threats of contempt and even cries of constitutional crisis. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
Dachs and Jonathan A. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write that appellate courts do not look kindly on cases involving violations of the basic rule that new facts may not be injected at the appellate level, yet such cases appear in the advance sheets and reporters with surprising regularity.
PerspectiveWednesday, December 6, 2006By Jonathan LippmanJonathan Lippman, a Supreme Court justice and the chief administrative judge of the New York courts, writes: There is a… [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
Trump may have been unusually hostile in his attitude toward congressional oversight, but as Jonathan Shaub has written, the executive’s expansive view of testimonial immunity has developed over the past several administrations, both Republican and Democratic. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am
In 1908, when Woodrow Wilson made the case for the vigorous exercise of presidential authority to lead the nation in “times of stress and change,” he sought to calm fears that doing so would upset the Constitution’s careful balancing of power between the president and Congress. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
The Justice Department has now filed a notice of appeal and a motion to partially stay U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
(A delay of only three weeks before seeking the indictment of Steve Bannon prompted “widespread exasperation” with the department, prompting Jonathan Shaub and Benjamin Wittes to discuss possible reasons for the delay in this Lawfare post.) [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm
Editor’s Note: The following article should be read in conversation with “Is the Justice Department Meeting the Moment? [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 11:02 am
The committee will hear the testimony of Kate Shaw, professor at Yeshiva University; Jonathan Shaub, professor at the University of Kentucky; Mark Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University; and Jennifer Mascott, professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
A few weeks ago, the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Walter Shaub, the former director of the Office of Government Ethics, compared the Ricchetti brothers’ situation to an instance from former President Trump’s tenure. [read post]
