Search for: "Jones v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright On 24 January 2024, HHJ Clarke handed down judgement in the case of Thatchers Cider Company Limited v Aldi Stores Limited [2024] EWHC 88 (IPEC). [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:50 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Jérémie Gilbert, Elizabeth Macpherson, Emily Jones, & Julia Dehm, The Rights of Nature as a Legal Response to the Global Environmental Crisis? [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
  Osborne Clarke, TechMonitor, FinTech Times, Mishcon de Reya, DLA Piper, the Privacy and Information Law Blog and the Data Protection Report have more information. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1, 11 n.8 (2004) (courts must interpret statutes "consistently"); Clark v. [read post]