Search for: "Jones v. Cunningham" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The emphasis on Jones and constitutional avoidance is very helpful because most of the Jones analysis focuses on the Fifth Amendment and Winship, whereas Booker is strictly a Sixth Amendment case. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was  unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_01735.htmThe… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
In Jones, which the L.A. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
New Jersey, and “must be found by a jury, not a judge,” Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:42 am
  Neither Jones, nor Apprendi, nor Ring, nor Blakely, nor Booker countenance this result. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Over the next two weeks, our contributors will examine topics ranging from the lower courts’ response to the Court’s decision in AT&T v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
Jones as involving statutory interpretation rather than a statement of constitutional doctrine and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
At Concurring Opinions, Lawrence Cunningham discusses AT&T v. [read post]