Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 3,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 4:37 am by Jeffrey Brown
A Massachusetts district court judge has held that evidence acquired as the result of GPS use before Jones is not subject to suppression because law enforcement acted in good faith, pursuant to nonbinding precedent. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
On March 11, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Madora Jones, Administrator of the Estate of ReDon Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Daniel Sullivan
The Eastern District of Louisiana recently issued another opinion interpreting Chiasson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:48 pm
 The district court held that this new development entitled the defendant to habeas relief, because it created a substantial probability that Jones was, in fact, innocent of the offense.The Ninth Circuit reverses.Judge Tashima holds that a jury would still probably find Jones guilty -- beyond a reasonable doubt -- even when every witness testifies he's innocent and there's no evidence of guilt beyond the testimony of those three… [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:30 am by Jeffrey Brown
Mo. 2012), the district court held that the good faith exception should not apply to GPS evidence where there was no binding precedent but also held that reasonable suspicion - rather than probable cause - is sufficient to satisfy the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:38 pm by Jeffrey Brown
Pa. 2012), the district court held that pre-Jones GPS evidence violated the Fourth Amendment and does not fall under the Davis good faith rule.Law enforcement used two GPS devices in the investigation - one for about a month and the second for two weeks. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
On May 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am by Leesfield Scolaro
  Shortly thereafter, the Defendants improperly removed the crewmember Jones Act case to federal court in the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 7:05 pm by Kenan Farrell
Perriguey of Law Works LLC Defendant:     William Michael Jones, Mindy Jones, www.boneprone.com, www.tubekings.com, www.socalmovies.com, La Vista, Chin Holdings China, Marvin Greencarrier, John Does 1 – 100, John Doe Companies 1-100 Cause:    Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement, Vicarious Copyright Infringement, Inducement of Copyright Infringement, False Designation of Origin Court:    Oregon… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Last Wednesday, I noted in this post some of the reasons why Judge Carney's decision in Jones v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:36 am by Jennifer S. Taub
We are pleasantly surprised by the 9-0 Supreme Court decision today in Jones v. [read post]