Search for: "Jones v. Helms" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:03 am by Ted Frank
[Frankel; Trask; Erica John Fund v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
[For a similar statement, see McCabe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The first problem I have with Jones' story is that the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the validity of the pill in Moran v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News   No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times   One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Peacock’s solicitors, Hodge, Jones & Allen have released a statement here. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Heels, Chris Heinzle, Laurie Helms, Curtis Henderson, Howard Henderson, Martin Henderson, Misty Henry, Cheryl Herman, Jeanna Hernandez, Dan Herrera, Mike Higgins, John Hildwein, Larry Hill, Serena Hill, Doug Hilts, Mark Hilts, Jason Hinkley, Wayne Hinson, Matt Hoban, Paula Maggiore Hoerner, Garey Hoffman, Ron Hoffman, Kevin Hofing, Tim Hogan, Chris Hogue, Janine Holmgren, Eric Hood, Leigh J. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]