Search for: "Jones v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 7,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 1:59 am by sally
Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41; [2011] WLR (D) 26 “Even if an earning capacity might also sometimes be relevant to a fair distribution of the assets pursuant to the sharing principle, it did not follow that the earning capacity should itself be treated as one of those assets, still less that an attempt should be made to capitalise it.” [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
A quick summary of Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, reported today:The facts: The parties were married in 1996, at which time the husband was the sole owner of a company. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
More on Jones v Kernott (you're not getting bored with this yet, are you?) [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Chanel Jones of Merrillville, Indiana over her salon’s name [Julie Zerbo, Fashion Law Blog via Amy Landers, PrawfsBlawg] Tags: apparel, trademarksChanel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
The Supreme Court has allowed the appeal in Jones v Kernott, restoring the order of the county court (i.e. that Ms Jones was entitled to a 90% share of the property). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
I'm no expert on the machinations of the Supreme Court, but it seems to me that the judgment in Kernott v Jones will not now be handed down until the Michaelmas term, which begins on the third of October. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:18 am by traceydennis
Jones v Kernott [2010] EWCA Civ 578; [2010] WLR (D) 136 “Where the parties had agreed when they separated that they had equal interests in a residential property conveyed into their joint names there had to be something to displace those interests before the court could impute from the parties’ conduct an intention to vary that equality. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:51 pm
The Conglomerate is hosting an interesting blog symposium about Jones v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:01 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Need for hearing In 1991, appellant, Alvin Jones, Jr. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 1:59 am
Pitts and Others v Jones “In distinguishing oral promises as either guarantees or indemnities under the Statute of Frauds 1677, the classic criterion relying on interest in the transaction was not to be taken literally; not every interest in the transaction took the promise out of the statute. [read post]