Search for: "Jones v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 1,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
I'm no expert on the machinations of the Supreme Court, but it seems to me that the judgment in Kernott v Jones will not now be handed down until the Michaelmas term, which begins on the third of October. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jones (North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 14, 2013) on SSRN. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm by Lawrence Solum
Priester (Florida Coastal School of Law) has posted Five Answers and Three Questions after United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
I'm not sure that it would, save in the unlikely case that that the facts matched Kernott v Jones exactly. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:10 pm
 The new rage:  cigarette theft.Oh, and when officers search the defendant, Robert Jones, they find in his possession . . . a carton of Virginia Slims cigarettes.Case closed. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Jones (University of Michigan) has an opinion piece on CNN that brings her historical research to bear on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Schuette v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Jones is not that presidents need immunity from civil litigation over such conduct but that people who behave as heedlessly of others as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump do get what they deserve, even if they end up as president.An alternative way around Clinton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:14 am
After Jones parked the car, Torres paid Jones $60 to have intercourse with her and for her to orally copulate him. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:41 am by Lawrence Solum
That focus leaves women, people of color, and those less privileged, unprotected. [read post]