Search for: "Jones v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 2:29 pm
Commissioner of Social Security draws a cloud of uncertainty over a Social Security judge's duty to develop the factual record in a disability case. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Dealers who were denied a license or whose securities were deemed fraudulent received a notice to that effect and a hearing before the blue-sky administrator. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber dismissed the Information Commissioner’s Office appeal of a lower court’s decision to overturn an order requiring Experian to change how it handles customer data. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:02 pm
In Consumers’ Research v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Internet and Social Media The Government has finally published its response [pdf] to the 2017 “call for evidence” on the impact of social media on the administration of justice. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Surveillance On 15 May 2024, a London Administrative Court handed down its judgment in the case of ADL & Ors v SSHD [2024] EWHC 994 (Admin). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog had a post on the CJEU announcing that judgment will be handed down in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Internet and Social Media On 21 January 2020, the Information Commissioner’s Office has published its final Age Appropriate Design Code, a set of 15 standards that online services should meet to protect children’s privacy. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Information Commissioner’s Office said a breach notification was reviewed and it was determined no further action was needed. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Ireland’s data protection commissioner has launched an inquiry into the processing of personal data of users of the Tinder dating app. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
” A human operator would then evaluate if a flagged security concern necessitates action. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
Internet and Social Media Google has stopped telling publishers of content removal from search results under the EU GDPR’s “right to be forgotten” rules. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Briggins, 50 N.Y.2d 302, 309, 428 N.Y.S.2d 909, 406 N.E.2d 766 (1980) (concurring opinion) (Jones, J.). [read post]