Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2025, 8:43 am
More than two decades later, the Supreme Court overruled Hammer in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 3:50 am
Bush appointee), Judge Edith Hollan Jones relied on the 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:40 pm
Supreme Court has declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Zembrka v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:40 pm
Supreme Court has declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Zembrka v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:26 am
The post-Enron years have been kind to V&E. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 7:30 am
Jones, whose involvement resembles a typical “pig-butchering” scam. [read post]
26 Jan 2025, 2:53 pm
SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 11:20 am
See, e.g., Zimmerman v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 7:21 am
From Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain's decision in Swaby v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
Under the new NAGPRA regulations, one of the key innovations is the addition of specific deadlines that institutions must adhere to.[34] While museums are publicly supportive of the goals to streamline the repatriation process, some museums have argued that these timelines are unmanageable.[35] Museums have long blamed their delays in the NAGPRA repatriation process on a lack of resources.[36] Even the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) has stated that the timelines seemed… [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 1:59 am
It says a great deal about the state of modern journalism and its unrelenting efforts at self-destruction. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm
App. 2023) (stating: "Simply couching such statements in terms of opinion does not dispel these implications; and the statement, 'In my opinion Jones is a liar,' can cause as much damage to reputation as the statement, 'Jones is a liar.'") (citing Lipsig v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:47 am
These are basically the facts of NAACP v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
If you don’t believe me, please read this long quote from a 1984 Supreme Court decision, Bob Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 7:51 am
Regulatory Rollback and Legal Challenges The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
From Monday's decision in Harborne v. [read post]
