Search for: "Jones v. Superior Court (People) (1979)" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Superior Court (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 92, 99; see also Landry v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Superior Court of Orange County, for example, a California appellate court affirmed a trial court's order to compel genetic testing of the mother of an infant born with brain damage (17 Cal. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
Eleven years later, the Court decided a case in which the reason for the racial discrimination was religious in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
Supp. 2d 367, 374 (D.N.J. 2010). 41037-1-II / 41047-8-II FACTS The State charged Roden in two separate cause numbers with attempted possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 09-1-01153-0) and with possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 10-1-00091-4). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The speakers with me on the session were Giovanni Dosi, Director, Institute of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Pisa and Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, University of Sussex. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
If you learn your colleague Mary Jones has accused your mutual employer of sexual harassment, you may not want to be legally bound to indefinitely keep that secret fact segregated from all the other things you know about Jones, and all the other things you might say about her to coworkers or friends. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
“The [Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage] Act does not require an equal division of marital property, but an equitable division” In re Marriage of Jones, 543 NE 2d 119 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1989 Unless the parties work together in the business and agree to continue working together, the business will not be divided between the parties. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
It also changed the name of the Native Land Court to the Maori Land Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]