Search for: "Jones v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2025, 8:38 am by Amy Howe
Marvin Quattlebaum, and Allison Jones Rushing. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Matter of Riera v Ayabaca, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2025 WL 395851, 2025 N.Y. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 5:36 am by Sasha Volokh
As to the first option, the Court has held that eradicating racial discrimination is compelling in cases such as Bob Jones University v. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 12:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Poverty Law Ctr., _ U.S. _ (2022) (Thomas, J., solo dissent from denial of certiorari); Ben-Levi v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On 12 February 2025, there was a hearing in Titan Wealth v Okunola KB-2024-000960. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm
That, he says, should have informed the City that he probably didn't receive notice of the tickets, so additional efforts at notice were required under Jones before his property was seized.Judge Thomas responds to that argument on the next-to-last page of her opinion. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords debated Lord Clement Jones’s Private Members Bill, which aims to set out a legislative framework for the responsible use of algorithmic and automated decision-making systems in the public sector. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Technically, the court instructed the lower courts to review the case in light of the recent decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 15 October 2024 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the data protection case of  Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In recent years, Justice Thomas, later joined by Justice Gorsuch, has suggested that NY Times v. [read post]
” Judge Allison Jones Rushing concurred saying, “The handgun license requirement is nevertheless constitutional because it is consistent with the principles underlying our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Exactly: see, for example, Sterling v Rand & Anor [2019] EWHC 2560 (Ch) and Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022: we’ve previously discussed the issue here. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 17 July 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Jones Nickolds v Pearce. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 3 July 2024, judgment was handed down by HHJ Parkes in the strike out application of Pacini & Anor v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [2024] EWHC 1709 (KB). [read post]