Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 3,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Nelson (joined by Justice Wheat) suggests that under United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am by MBettman
In each case, the warrantless placement of the GPS on the defendant’s vehicle occurred before the 2012 United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:51 am by Ogletree Abbott
Perry advises that he has incurred tens of thousands of dollars in medical bills and has been forced to completely forego medical care due to Sea Subs’ failure to pay maintenance and cure benefits under the laws of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, and Ryburn v. [read post]