Search for: "Jordan v. Bear" Results 21 - 40 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
* No Air for Jordan: Michael Jordan Loses Fight over Marks in ChinaBasketball star Michael Jordan faces problems protecting his image in the world's most populous jurisdiction, writes sports-loving guest Kat Jani. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:52 am
Ctr., 6 NY3d at 539; see Jordan v City of New York, 41 AD3d 658; Matter of Vasquez v City of Newburgh, 35 AD3d 621, 623; Rechenberger v Nassau County Med. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Although the panel was unanimous, the case produced three opinions — an opinion for the court by Judge Jordan and concurrences by Judges Rendell and Ambro, the latter of which expressly urges the Supreme Court to take up the case to provide further guidance on the proper interpretation of Missouri v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:16 pm
  (Rendell, Chagares, and Jordan, Circuit Judges)       In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
A recent decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan) suggests that the Jordan principles might have a significant impact. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
Beverly Mann of Angry Bear discusses both Schuette and Wednesday’s decision in the habeas case White v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co. (2000), 77 B.C.L.R. (3d) 44 and Jordan. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:38 am
Nike alleges that defendants are “manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, and/or selling the Nike Trademarks in the form of counterfeit shoes bearing exact copies or colorable imitations of the Nike Trademarks,” including Nike’s NIKE, SWOOSH DESIGN, NIKE AIR, AIR JORDAN, and JUST DO IT registered trademarks.Nike also alleges it sent cease-and-desist letters demanding that defendants stop making sales, but defendants’… [read post]