Search for: "Joseph Blocher"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
Joseph Blocher, Duke Law School, has published Government Viewpoint and Government Speech. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:10 am
Esbeck, Uses and Abuses of Textualism and Originalism in Establishment Clause Interpretation, (Utah Law Review, Vol. 2011, No. 2).Joseph Blocher, Schrödinger’s Cross: The Quantum Mechanics of the Establishment Clause, (Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming).Barbara P. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Joseph Blocher (Duke Law School) has posted Schrödinger’s Cross: The Quantum Mechanics of the Establishment Clause (Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Joseph Blocher (Duke Law School) has posted Reverse Incorporation of State Constitutional Law on SSRN. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 11:55 am
Joseph Blocher (Duke Law School), Government Property and Government Speech. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:27 pm
(Incidentally, both Nelson Tebbe and Joseph Blocher raise some interesting points quite relevant to my line of thinking here in their contributions to a wonderful online colloquium on Summum some time ago in the Northwestern Law Review Colloquy) I should add one last note/plug: Case Western's Law Review will be hosting a symposium on the subject of "Government Speech" in November 2010. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Joseph Ehrenreich of Pendleton, owner of Destination Management Group of Buffalo, was sentenced to one year in jail by Niagara County Judge Matthew Murphy. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
The Beechwood/Blocher Foundation reimbursed the consumer for the amount of his bid. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:24 am
" In the same online symposium, Joseph Blocher (Duke University Law School) analyzes similar issues with respect to the Sunnum case in this essay. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:49 am
On PrawfsBlawg, Joseph Blocher is soliciting reader contributions on what was the most significant development in legal academia this decade? [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
Duke Law Professor Joseph Blocher’s argument that NFL instant replay reviews should reconsider on-field calls de novo has resulted in an extensive debate. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:03 am
Duke Law professor Joseph Blocher asks a great question: Why Aren't Instant Replays Reviewed De Novo? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:54 pm
Joseph Blocher asks an intriguing question. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm
We suppose it's probably good for our mental well-being, but it does mean we miss making observations like one made recently by Duke Law prof Joseph Blocher over at the PrawfsBlawg (Hat tip: Legal Blog Watch.) [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:18 am
Over on the PrawfsBlawg, guest blogger Joseph Blocher, a professor at Duke Law School, asks a great question that may resonate with some of you lawyers/NFL fans out there: Why are instant replays in the NFL (or in any other sport) subject to a heightened standard of review that requires “conclusive†or “indisputable†evidence to overturn an incorrect call? [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:58 pm
However, law professor Joseph Blocher makes a strong argument that instant replay should instead follow the model of de novo review: Why are instant replays in the NFL (or in any other sport) subject to a heightened standard of review that requires “conclusive†or “indisputable†evidence to overturn an incorrect call? [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
New to the Prawfs conversation are: Sarah Lawsky (comedy and tax, GW/UVA); Peter Appel (UGA; environmental); John Greenman (UOregon; con law); Fabio Arcila (Touro; Crim Pro); Joseph Blocher (Duke; con law); and Richard Albert (BC; comparative con law). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:05 pm
Marin Levy and Joseph Blocher Jr. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
The other contributors are Joseph Blocher (Duke) and Prawfs alums Christopher Lund (Wayne State) and Bernadette Meyler (Cornell). [read post]
24 May 2009, 12:14 pm
Here is this week's collection of newly available First Amendment scholarship: 1) Joseph Blocher, Categoricalism and Balancing In First and Second Amendment Analysis, 84 N.Y.U. [read post]
