Search for: "Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
[Co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two faithless elector cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm by Josh Blackman
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Blackman was first piqued by Tillman's position shortly after he became a law professor, and he was thereafter persuaded. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Gordon Ahl
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm by Tia Sewell
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman and I address this issue in our new article, Is the President an 'Officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment?. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:59 am by Josh Blackman
I criticized this bill in a post I co-authored for Lawfare with my colleague, Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer at the Maynooth University Department of Law in Ireland. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am by Josh Blackman
[If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment. ] [This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Over the past four years, we have defended many of President Trump's actions as a constitutional matter, while criticizing those actions as a policy matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm by Josh Blackman
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
In the Emoluments Clauses litigation, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the  methodology to consider post-ratification history. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm by Mark Graber
  Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman maintain that the persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment thought that only Congress could implement Section 3 (“Only the Feds Could Disqualify Madison Cawthorn and Majorie Taylor Greene,” New York Times, April 20, 2022). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am by Guest Blogger
Josh Blackman is Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about this issue a decade ago in a paper, fittingly titled, "The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am by Josh Blackman
 Seth Barrett Tillman and I have described the basis for equitable jurisdiction in Young in very similar terms: In Young, the government was regulating the railroad company. [read post]