Search for: "Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 101 - 120
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
[Co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two faithless elector cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I offered a similar observation on Lawfare last month. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 4:40 pm
Pildes (University of Chicago Law Forum Forthcoming) Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part III: The Appointments, Impeachment, Commissions, and Oath or Affirmation Clauses by Seth Barrett Tillman & Josh Blackman (62 South Texas Law Review 349 (2023)) Bill of Rights Nondelegation by Eli Nachmany (49 Brigham Young University Law Review forthcoming) The Death of… [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Blackman was first piqued by Tillman's position shortly after he became a law professor, and he was thereafter persuaded. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:18 pm
" In 2021, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the Governor's powers to fill Senate vacancies in an article about insurrection: "The Constitution authorizes a governor to temporarily fill a senate vacancy by appointment. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I address this issue in our new article, Is the President an 'Officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment?. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:59 am
I criticized this bill in a post I co-authored for Lawfare with my colleague, Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer at the Maynooth University Department of Law in Ireland. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay on Lawfare. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
[If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment. ] [This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Over the past four years, we have defended many of President Trump's actions as a constitutional matter, while criticizing those actions as a policy matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman maintain that the persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment thought that only Congress could implement Section 3 (“Only the Feds Could Disqualify Madison Cawthorn and Majorie Taylor Greene,” New York Times, April 20, 2022). [read post]
