Search for: "Josh Blackman" Results 1 - 20 of 1,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
More: anecdotes of Reich at Yale from Supreme Court Justice Sam Alito, via Josh Blackman. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Josh Blackman, who has commented extensively on the Rule 8.4(g) debates, passes this along: In 2016, the American Bar Association proposed Model Rule 8.4(g). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:18 am by SHG
“Rule 8.4(g) is well-intentioned, but it has the potential to suppress attorney speech on matters of public concern, if that speech may be viewed as ‘demeaning’ to others,” Josh Blackman, a professor of constitutional law at the South Texas College of Law in Houston, said in an email. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:53 am by Immigration Prof
Hawaii by Josh Blackman, 51 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law (2019) Abstract Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The argument drew disagreement from Benjamin Wittes, Andrew Kent and Marty Lederman, which in turn provoked a response by Josh Blackman, who holds views similar to mine. [read post]
20 May 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Josh Blackman, The Atlantic] A constitutional right to religious exemptions from otherwise applicable laws? [read post]
18 May 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
Josh Blackman furthered the criticism, exploring Mueller's constitutional analysis in light of the Office of Legal Counsel's opinions on the Clear Statement Rule. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am by Jack Goldsmith
Someone on Twitter recently asked: “What is your most [fire emoji] take that absolutely infuriates people and you know deep down in your heart is 100% true”? [read post]
4 May 2019, 11:50 am by Jack Goldsmith
I’ve been in a cave for several weeks crashing to complete my new book, and am only now emerging to read Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report and the commentary on it. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:03 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Josh Blackman argued that Mueller's theory on the Take Care Clause has no basis in precedent and probed whether the special counsel’s constitutional analysis might chill the president’s performance of Article II duties. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:53 am by Immigration Prof
Improper Commandeering by Josh Blackman, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2019 Abstract Pop quiz! [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:04 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Josh Blackman explored the special counsel’s analysis of the Take Care Clause and corrupt intent. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 6:14 pm by Gerard Magliocca
Josh Blackman had an interesting post over on Volokh that asks the following question: Does the original public meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment require the census to ask about citizenship? [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:01 am by Glenn Reynolds
CENSUS: From Josh Blackman, an argument that the federal government is actually required to ask about citizenship. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 12:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law Houston) has posted Improper Commandeering (University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2019) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman critiqued Mueller’s conclusion that because the bribery statute can be applied to the president, so too can the obstruction statute. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:23 am by Howard Bashman
“The Special Counsel’s Constitutional Analysis”: Josh Blackman has this blog post at “Lawfare. [read post]