Search for: "Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 9:39 pm
Ilya Shapiro and I wrote about both issues in the WSJ: The second sanctuary policy is harder to justify. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm
[President Trump's Tweet Demonstrates Why He Can Rescind His Predecessor's Immigration Policy] Ilya Shapiro and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Cato Institute and Professor Jeremy Rabkin in DHS v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
Lyle Denniston covered the filing for this blog, while at The Federalist, Ilya Shapiro and Josh Blackman urge the Court not to “rush what could become a landmark separation-of-powers case. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” In another post at Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in next Term’s Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
” But both Josh and Ilya make some pretty strong doctrinal and precedential cases for their positions. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:04 pm
Ilya Shapiro and I filed the Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Ilya Shapiro and I wrote about the case in the WSJ. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
” At the “Room for Debate” feature of The New York Times, Eric Ruben and Josh Blackman discuss gun control and the Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 9:47 am
Additional Resources: The Social Security Administration Shouldn’t Be Deciding Who’s Too “Mentally Defective” to Own a Gun, July 5, 2016, CATO Institute, By Ilya Shapiro, Josh Blackman and Randal John Myer More Blog Entries: Who is Getting the Most from Social Security Disability? [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Ilya Shapiro moved for my admission during the oral arguments for Zubik v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:26 pm
(If you are interested in this convoluted history, check out Ilya Shapiro's excellent new book, Supreme Disorder.) [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:05 am
(Ilya Shapiro moved for my admission; the Chief, perhaps against better judgment, granted the motion.) [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
Coverage comes from Mark Walsh of Education Week, with commentary from Kenneth Jost, who at Jost on Justice discusses an amicus brief in the case which argues that “a ruling for the religious groups also could undermine state laws protecting the right of terminally ill patients to reject extraordinary life-sustaining measures”; from Greg Lipper, who argues at Bill of Health Blog that “the science underlying the plaintiffs’ arguments that the government requires… [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The Once and Future Privileges or Immunities Clause, 25 George Mason Law Review 1207 (2020) (with Ilya Shapiro). [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:27 pm
I wrote; Ilya Shapiro and I filed the Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:45 am
On this basis, the Court reversed and remanded the Third Circuit’s decision for consideration of Bond’s challenge to the statute under which she was charged.Justice Ginsburg also wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Breyer, emphasizing the point that “Bond, like any other defendant, has a personal right not to be convicted under a constitutionally invalid law, and that there is no prudential barrier to the consideration of such claims.UPDATE: More from Josh… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Ilya Shapiro and Josh Blackman, writing for the Washington Times, contend that the Second Amendment could be “easily incorporated against the states through the” Due Process Clause, but they argue that resolving the case under the Privileges or Immunities Clause would both be “more historically accurate” and “prevent . . . judicial overreach. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:51 pm
Ilya Shapiro and I filed the Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
Ed Whelan and Ilya Shapiro flagged many of the high points and low points. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am
” (Full disclosure: Josh and I, along with Leif Olson and the Cato Institute’s Ilya Shapiro, were co-counsel on Cato’s amicus brief to the Fifth Circuit.) [read post]
