Search for: "Josh Wright" Results 121 - 140 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm by Walter Olson
Behind the antitrust assault on Google [Jerry Brito, Josh Wright, more] Rapid rise of lawsuit lenders [WSJ] And a Searle Civil Justice Institute conference on third party financing of litigation; More law firms muscle into class action against e-book publishers [PaidContent] Fifth Circuit questions cy pres [Trask] And a new edition of the Federalist Society’s Class Action Watch is out; When the house painters announce they’re not leaving: “Britain plans to… [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher Wolf
Not well-recognized at the time were a number of concerns, mini-dissents if you will, expressed by Federal Trade Commissioner Josh Wright. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:11 pm
I will give some remarks but the real stars of the show are the two commenters: the Honorable Josh Wright, FTC Commissioner, and Steven Pearlstein, the Washington Post’s Pulitzer-prize winning business and economics columnist and Robinson Professor of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) Josh Wright and I have a column in today’s Washington Times critiquing the economics of the Durbin interchange fees price control amendment. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Josh Wright doesn’t buy it. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:10 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) I mentioned a few weeks back that Josh Wright and I had authored an amicus brief in support of cert in the case of Wine Country Gift v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:04 am
Josh Wright is Assistant Professor at George Mason University School of Law and a former Scholar in Residence at the FTC. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 3:09 am
Josh Wright:The Economist seems to think so, relying on evidence from this new paper by Joel Waldfogel and Ben Shiller. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:41 am by Steve Bainbridge
" In context, Romney was making the unobjectionable point that, as Josh Wright puts it in a great post, "The ability to impose sanctions on an economic partner is fundamental to modern contracting. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Ted Frank
A new report by Josh Wright finds, says the Pennsylvania Record,that Philadelphia courts host an especially large number of cases and have a larger docket than expected; Philadelphia plaintiffs are less likely to settle than plaintiffs in other state courts; and Philadelphia plaintiffs are disproportionately likely to prefer jury trials. [read post]
7 May 2009, 7:20 pm
Josh Wright is Assistant Professor at George Mason University School of Law and a former Scholar in Residence at the FTC. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:10 pm
Josh Wright is Assistant Professor at George Mason University School of Law and a former Scholar in Residence at the FTC. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Marshall was about to start two-a-day workouts with the Hornets when he drowned in the pool at the hotel during a family reunion July 29, 2007, said Josh Wright, an attorney for Marshall's family. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 6:53 am
Josh Wright and Adam Levitin have been going back and forth about Wright's paper (co-authored with David Evans) about the predicted impact of the adoption of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) on the availability of credit, economic growth, and new business formation (many new businesses rely on their founder's personal consumer credit, such as credit cards, to start businesses, a point for which the CFPA makes no allowance). [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:35 am
David Evans and Josh Wright have a new paper posted on SSRN on “The Effect of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 on Consumer Credit. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:58 am by Todd Zywicki
 Last week the topic was behavioral economics and its implications for liberty and featured an essay by Doug Ginsburg and Josh Wright with several discussants. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:08 pm
Josh Wright at ToTM has a terrific post up this morning that wonderfully illustrates just how fascinating the Jones argument and decision could be for broad swaths of legal theory. [read post]