Search for: "Josh Wright" Results 121 - 140 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 10:33 pm by Walter Olson
Correct result, yet potential for mischief in latest SCOTUS climate ruling [Ilya Shapiro/Cato, my earlier take] Wouldn’t even want to guess: how the Howard Stern show handles sexual harassment training [Hyman] Philadelphia: $21 million award against emergency room handling noncompliant patient [Kennerly] Antitrust assault on Google seems geared to protect competitors more than consumers [Josh Wright] “They knew there was a risk!” [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm by Eric
By Eric Goldman Last week I participated in a conference entitled "The Law and Economics of Search Engines and Online Advertising" at George Mason Law School, sponsored by Google. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by Francis Pileggi
And all of us knew that we were fortunate to have the opportunity to clerk for an amazing group of judges, consisting of Judges Latchum, Schwartz, and Stapleton, as well as Senior Judges Steele, Layton, and Wright.        4)                  You joined the Superior Court in 1985, and before that you were in private practice with Morris Nichols.  [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:44 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Confirmed panelists include Maurice Stucke (University of Tennessee), Steve Salop (Georgetown University), Avishalom Tor (Haifa University), and Josh Wright (George Mason University). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:16 am by Walter Olson
Not so fast, buster [Josh Wright, TotM] Left-tilting legal academy? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:08 pm by Walter Olson
EU imposes unisex insurance rates [BBC, Wright] Law blog on the offense? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Josh Wright comments on my recent bad mouthing of empirical legal scholarship. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Josh Wright (George Mason Law) has posted Does Antitrust Enforcement in High Tech Markets Benefit Consumers? [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:10 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
Josh Barrett of Tablet Legal reviews TrialPad, an iPad app that can be used for courtroom presentations. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:10 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) I mentioned a few weeks back that Josh Wright and I had authored an amicus brief in support of cert in the case of Wine Country Gift v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 11:41 am by Steve Bainbridge
More from Josh Wright, who asserts that "the claim that I bemoan the irrelevance of ELS is misplaced." [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:33 pm by Ted Frank
If Last's description of a "voluntary agreement" to not sell detergents with phosphates is accurate, it just may violate the antitrust laws, as Josh Wright describes in response to my suggestion. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Walter Olson
Attaching strings to its permission gives the Federal Communications Commission a way to fund social programs Congress would never, ever pass [Stoll, Future of Capitalism] More: Josh Wright, TotM. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) Speaking of amicus briefs, shortly before Christmas Josh Wright and I filed a brief in support of a petition for certiorari in an appeal from the 5th Circuit’s decision in Wine Country Gift v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:45 am by Walter Olson
[Point of Law, Bainbridge] Fourth Circuit revives CSX fraud suit against asbestos lawyers [Dan Fisher, Forbes] “Asbestos defendants want automatic access to info in bankruptcy trusts” [Chamber-backed LNL] Creation of noncompliant consumer financial product is a criminal offense under Dodd-Frank [Josh Wright, TotM] Man sues over seeing contestants eat rats on NBC reality show “Fear Factor” [six years ago on Overlawyered] Tags: asbestos, Canada, Child Protective… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) I was pleased, along with Josh Wright and several other antitrust scholars, to submit an amicus brief in support of cert. in the Tobacco Master Settlement Case.   [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:53 am by Todd Zywicki
Neither does my colleague Josh Wright. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 12:03 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Josh Wright tackles the titular issue in a TOTM post: The case for suspensions seems to fall on the argument that players will respond more readily to suspensions than fines, and in turn, that there is not a level of fines that will generate equivalent deterrence to the suspension. [read post]