Search for: "Joshua Matz" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
And of a more recent vintage, we cover a collection of Trump-inspired works, including books by Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, Alan Dershowitz, and Frank O. [read post]
As Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz explain in their comprehensive book on impeachment, “To End a Presidency,” criminal law was understood to be the province of the states, and there was very little federal criminal law at all until the mid-20th century. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:15 am by Kalvis Golde
” Moderated by WCL Professor Stephen Wermiel, the panel will feature Professor Aderson Francois of Georgetown Law, Marcia Coyle from the National Law Journal, the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Brianne Gorod and Joshua Matz of Kaplan Hecker & Fink. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:00 pm by Howard Bashman
“Federal Defenders and the Sixth Amendment’s Zone of Interests”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 10:05 am by Howard Bashman
“The Constitution and the Zone of Interests Test”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 5:27 am by Corey Brettschneider
Matz and Lawrence Tribe's To End a Presidency, as well as Cass Sunstein's Impeachment. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman and Joshua Matz call the result “a resounding victory for the rule of law over the rule of Trump. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:54 am by Howard Bashman
“Title VII Bans Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz “address[es] three of the most common arguments against protecting transgender people under Title VII” in the latest of a series of posts about a case next term that presents the question. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 10:53 am by Howard Bashman
“Objections to Protecting Transgender People Under Title VII Are Meritless”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Take Care, Joshua Matz explains why “Title VII must be read as prohibiting discrimination based on transgender status,” answering a question presented in next term’s R.G. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
“Two Reasons Why Title VII Bans Discrimination Based on Transgender Status”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:16 am by Howard Bashman
“The Plain Meaning of Title VII”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Joshua Matz explains at Take Care why, contrary to “articles and tweets [that] have celebrated the Chief Justice for his bravery, principle, and (long-delayed) unwillingness to accept pretextual reasons for a Trump Administration policy” in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:08 pm by Howard Bashman
“Yes, the public’s perception of the Supreme Court matters”: Leah Litman, Joshua Matz, and Steve Vladeck have this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” And at the “Take Care” blog, Joshua Matz has a post titled “A Landmark (But Qualified) Victory for Transgender Rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Bench Memos / National Review] * And speaking of President Trump, Joshua Matz and Laurence Tribe have this excellent explanation of why the Supreme Court does not have a role in adjudicating impeachments. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:11 am by Howard Bashman
“Why SCOTUS Must Hear the Census Case on the Merits”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog about an amicus brief he filed in that case. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz “explain[s] why the government’s arguments against judicial review” in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:44 am by Howard Bashman
“Trump’s Unyielding Religious Exemptions from the Contraceptive Coverage Requirement Are Unconstitutional”: Joshua Matz has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]