Search for: "Joshua Matz"
Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
In the Los Angeles Times, Jim Newton reviews both Uncertain Justice, a new book on the Roberts Court by Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, and the new biography of Justice Antonin Scalia, by Bruce Murphy. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz, introducing excerpts from an amicus brief filed in the entry-ban cases on behalf of a group of constitutional law scholars, argues that “the President’s public statements—before and after inauguration—about why he issued his executive order” constitute “admissions of anti-Muslim animus. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz argues that “[t]he Supreme Court is now a co-owner and co-author of the travel ban,” and that “with that position comes major institutional risk to the Supreme Court’s public legitimacy. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:49 am by Ronald K.L. Collins
DeMitchell, Student Dress Codes and the First Amendment: Legal Challenges and Policy Issues (2014) Laurence Tribe & Joshua Matz, Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court & The Constitution (2014) → Law Review: A Harvard Law Review Symposium on free speech was published recently. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:08 pm by Corey Brettschneider
As our lawyer Joshua Matz explains in the briefs, the animus doctrine provides the clearest explanation of why Trump’s publicly-announced motives make the travel ban unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause, which has long been understood to prohibit the government from favoring or disfavoring any particular religion. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:28 pm
The dream team of lawyers representing the plaintiff includes legal scholars Erwin Chemerinsky, Zephyr Teachout, and Laurence Tribe, as well as Bush II and Obama senior ethics counsels Richard Painter and Norman Eisen (as well as other attorneys, including my former student Stuart McPhail).The substantive argument for an Emoluments Clause violation has been made in various fora already, including by Eisen, Painter, Tribe, and Joshua Matz in an article in The Atlantic, and by Eisen,… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Whether this claim can stand up to historical scrutiny remains doubtful, in light of analyses by John Mikhail (here and here), and by Joshua Matz and Larry Tribe. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” In Wired, Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz look at how the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s possible replacement by Gorsuch may affect the Supreme Court’s approach to technological issues, noting that when Gorsuch has been “faced with questions about faulty police databases and efforts to interdict child pornography in cyberspace, he has displayed a sensitivity to the underlying technology that suggests he may be more interested in these… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Reviews of Uncertain Justice, a new book on the Roberts Court by Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, come from this blog’s Stephen Wermiel, writing for The Washington Post, Jeff Bleich in the Los Angeles Review of Books,  and Arthur Bryant at Public Justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald K.L. Collins
Answer: That question is even less compatible with a short response than the previous one, and I’d rather let the fourth chapter of my forthcoming book (co-authored with a superb recent student of mine, Joshua Matz), Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution (Henry Holt, June, 3, 2014), speak for itself on that issue. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
The discussion that follows is drawn from several chapters of “Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution” (co-authored with Joshua Matz). * * * * * One of the Supreme Court’s most important roles in interpreting the Constitution is deciding what areas of public policy will be subject to the limits of constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
The work of our highest court is the subject of my latest book, “Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution,” co-authored with Joshua Matz. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm by Steve Kalar
As author Joshua Matz observes, the pair of cases “suggest[] that the Ninth Circuit has joined the Second and Third in its willingness to searchingly explore the underlying justification for child porn sentences in light of § 3553(a)’s framework.”Image of the Honorable Sandra S. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Joshua Matz comments on Pavan at Take Care. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am by Larry Tribe
Joshua Matz and I argued as much in the Maryland Law Review last October. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Joshua Matz provides an in-depth analysis of the route by which cases challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry into the United States of foreign nationals from six majority-Muslim countries may reach the Supreme Court, concluding that “that it matters a great deal how and when the Supreme Court ultimately reviews the Muslim Ban. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be view here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
In Chapter 1 of Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution, Joshua Matz and I tell this fascinating story, offering a guided tour of the biographies, doctrine, and fundamental principles at stake in this Court’s rulings on equality. [read post]