Search for: "Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Secret Service" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
In late December 2012, the President signed the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act, which strengthens the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to ensure it addresses the theft of trade secrets related to a product or service used or intended to be used in interstate or foreign commerce, and to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
In late December 2012, the President signed the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act, which strengthens the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to ensure it addresses the theft of trade secrets related to a product or service used or intended to be used in interstate or foreign commerce, and to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Transamerica Life Insurance Co (Patently-O) CAFC: Employee and officer liability for inducing infringement: Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Transamerica Life Insurance Co (Patently-O) CAFC: Employee and officer liability for inducing infringement: Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Today is Memorial Day in the United States of America, a day to honor those who made the supreme sacrifice and gave their lives in the service of their country. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
– section 22 orders (IPKat) IP Court Users’ Committee publishes ‘Working Group’s Consultation on Proposals for Reform of the Patents County Court’ (PatLit) IPO holds ‘trade mark surgery’ (Class 46)   United States US General David Kappos confirmation hearing (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Maier & Maier)… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
: Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd (ipwars) FCA: Infringing a registered design? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:41 am
He then escaped to the U.S., but, “[s]ince returning to the United States, Plaintiff has received numerous death threats and continues to face a death sentence that could be imposed by radical Muslims in the United States at any moment. [read post]