Search for: "Junior v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
The husband did not attend the hearing of the wife's application, but was represented by leading counsel and junior counsel.The court was therefore in the position of having to deal with the wife's application with no evidence from the husband as to his financial position.The wife's counsel submitted to the court that under the principles in Hadkinson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
This Round up was complied by Suneet Sharma a junior legal professional with a particular interest and experience in media, information and privacy law. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Jeff Vail
 The junior lawyer can also be the Coach or Rainmaker--what better way to pitch a client than to explain your intent to assemble a team of highly experienced attorneys, with a reasonably priced and highly motivated junior attorney taking up the often time-consuming task of coordination? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am by Peter Groves
Indeed, I would go on to say that the fact that there is a co-existence agreement in two Member States indicates that there is a likelihood of confusion in other Member States where the parties haven't struck a deal to prevent it.I would also have made sure that the UK co-existence agreement made clear that if the junior trade mark owner wanted to enter the Spanish market, there would have to be a new agreement. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Peck, cases on state bills of credit in the Jacksonian era, the Legal Tender cases, and Pollock v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2000) (stating that while the ownership of patent rights is typically a question exclusively for state courts, the question of whether contractual language effects a present assignment of patent rights, or an agreement to assign rights in the future, is resolved by Federal Circuit law); and Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. [read post]